Why a PEW Guide Is Never Really Finished

At Pufferfish Enthusiasts Worldwide, we have never seen our care guides as static documents. They are living resources that continue to evolve as new research, field observations, and shared experiences deepen our collective understanding of these remarkable fish.

Each guide begins with a foundation of evidence. Every statement is verified and tested in real aquarium conditions. But science never stands still. As new studies appear and keepers across the world share their results, we revisit what we have written. We refine the details, update the data, and improve our recommendations where needed.

This process is not about chasing perfection. It is about responsibility. Aquarists rely on these guides to make decisions that affect the health and welfare of living animals. Every dosage, every parameter, and every line of advice carries weight. That is why accuracy and transparency are at the core of everything we publish.

You will often see recent update dates on our articles. These reflect our ongoing commitment to reviewing and improving our content as knowledge grows. A guide that remains unchanged for years quickly becomes outdated, but a guide that continues to evolve remains useful and trustworthy.

A PEW guide is never written by one person alone. Each article draws on the knowledge of multiple contributors and editors, as well as the observations of members within our community groups. We are deeply grateful to everyone who shares their data, experiences, and photographs, and to the moderators who maintain the respectful, evidence-based discussions that make this collaboration possible.

Together, we continue to learn. Every revision makes our guides more accurate, more reliable, and more representative of the best practices in modern fishkeeping. That is why a PEW guide is never really finished.